• Anatole Vilhelm Wiik, Adeel Aqil, Bilal Al-Obaidi, Mads Brevadt, and Justin Peter Cobb.
• MSK Lab, Imperial College London, Michael Uren Hub, 2nd Floor, White City Campus, Wood Lane, London, W12 0BZ, UK. a.wiik@imperial.ac.uk.
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Nov 1; 141 (11): 1993-2000.

AimThe length of the femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a practical consideration to prevent gait impairment. The aim of this study was to determine if reducing the femoral stem length in THA would lead to impaired gait biomechanics.MethodsPatients uniformly with the same brand implant of differing lengths (100 mm vs 140-166 mm) were taken retrospectively from a prospective trial introducing a new short stem. Twelve patients without any other disorder to alter gait besides contralateral differing length stem THA were tested at differing gradients and speed on a validated instrumented treadmill measuring ground reaction forces. An anthropometrically similar group of healthy controls were analysed to compare.ResultsWith the same posterior surgical approach, the offset and length of both hips were reconstructed within 5 mm of each other with an identical mean head size of 36 mm. The short stem was the last procedure for all the hips with gait analysis occurring at a mean of 31 and 79 months postoperatively for the short and long stem THA, respectively. Gait analysis between limbs of both stem lengths demonstrated no statistical difference during any walking condition. In the 90 gait assessments with three loading variables, the short stem was the favoured side 51% of the time compared 49% for the long stem.ConclusionBy testing a range of practical walking activities, no lower limb loading differences can be observed by reducing the femoral stem length. A shorter stem demonstrates equivalence in preference during gait when compared to a reputable conventional stem in total hip arthroplasty.© 2021. The Author(s).

14 keywords...

hide…