• Anesthesiology · Dec 1999

    Selective iNOS inhibition attenuates acetylcholine- and bradykinin-induced vasoconstriction in lipopolysaccharide-exposed rat lungs.

    • L G Fischer, D J Horstman, K Hahnenkamp, N E Kechner, and G F Rich.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, University of Virginia, Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville 22906-0010, USA.
    • Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec 1; 91 (6): 1724-32.

    BackgroundNonselective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibition has detrimental effects in sepsis because of inhibition of the physiologically important endothelial NOS (eNOS). The authors hypothesized that selective inducible NOS (iNOS) inhibition would maintain eNOS vasodilation but prevent acetylcholine- and bradykinin-mediated vasoconstriction caused by lipopolysaccharide-induced endothelial dysfunction.MethodsRats were administered intraperitoneal lipopolysaccharide (15 mg/kg) with and without the selective iNOS inhibitors L-N6-(1-iminoethyl)-lysine (L-NIL, 3 mg/kg), dexamethasone (1 mg/kg), or the nonselective NOS inhibitor Nomega-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME, 5 mg/kg). Six hours later, the lungs were isolated and pulmonary vasoreactivity was assessed with hypoxic vasoconstrictions (3% O2), acetylcholine (1 microg), Biochemical Engineering, and bradykinin (3 microg). In additional lipopolysaccharide experiments, L-NIL (10 microM) or 4-Diphenylacetoxy-N-methylpiperidine methiodide (4-DAMP, 100 microM), a selective muscarinic M3 antagonist, was added into the perfusate.ResultsExhaled nitric oxide was higher in the lipopolysaccharide group (37.7+/-17.8 ppb) compared with the control group (0.4+/-0.7 ppb). L-NIL and dexamethasone decreased exhaled nitric oxide in lipopolysaccharide rats by 83 and 79%, respectively, whereas L-NAME had no effect. In control lungs, L-NAME significantly decreased acetylcholine- and bradykinin-induced vasodilation by 75% and increased hypoxic vasoconstrictions, whereas L-NIL and dexamethasone had no effect. In lipopolysaccharide lungs, acetylcholine and bradykinin both transiently increased the pulmonary artery pressure by 8.4+/-2.0 mmHg and 35.3+/-11.7 mmHg, respectively, immediately after vasodilation. L-NIL and dexamethasone both attenuated this vasoconstriction by 70%, whereas L-NAME did not. The acetylcholine vasoconstriction was dose-dependent (0.01-1.0 microg), unaffected by L-NIL added to the perfusate, and abolished by 4-DAMP.ConclusionsIn isolated perfused lungs, acetylcholine and bradykinin caused vasoconstriction in lipopolysaccharide-treated rats. This vasoconstriction was attenuated by administration of the iNOS inhibitor L-NIL but not with L-NAME. Furthermore, L-NIL administered with lipopolysaccharide preserved endothelium nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation, whereas L-NAME did not.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…