• Pediatric pulmonology · Sep 2018

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and CO2 removal: A randomized controlled crossover trial.

    • Roberto Bottino, Federica Pontiggia, Cinzia Ricci, Alessandro Gambacorta, Angela Paladini, Vladimiras Chijenas, Arunas Liubsys, Jurate Navikiene, Ausrine Pliauckiene, Domenica Mercadante, Mariarosa Colnaghi, Milena Tana, Chiara Tirone, Alessandra Lio, Claudia Aurilia, Roberta Pastorino, Velia Purcaro, Gianfranco Maffei, Pio Liberatore, Chiara Consigli, Cristina Haass, Gianluca Lista, Massimo Agosti, Fabio Mosca, and Giovanni Vento.
    • Department for the Protection of Women's Health and the Nascent Life, Division of Neonatology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy.
    • Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2018 Sep 1; 53 (9): 1245-1251.

    ObjectiveTo compare short-term application of nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV) with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP).Working HypothesisnHFOV improves CO2 removal with respect to nCPAP in preterm infants needing noninvasive respiratory support and persistent oxygen supply after the first 72 h of life.Study DesignMulticenter non-blinded prospective randomized crossover study.Patient SelectionThirty premature infants from eight tertiary neonatal intensive care units, of mean ± SD 26.4 ± 1.8 weeks of gestational age and 921 ± 177 g of birth weight.MethodologyInfants were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive a starting treatment mode of either nCPAP or nHFOV delivered by the ventilator CNO (Medin, Germany), using short binasal prongs of appropriate size. A crossover design with four 1-h treatment periods was used, such that each infant received both treatments twice. The primary outcome was the mean transcutaneous partial pressure of CO2 (TcCO2 ) value during the 2-h cumulative period of nHFOV compared with the 2-h cumulative period of nCPAP.ResultsSignificantly lower TcCO2 values were observed during nHFOV compared with nCPAP: 47.5 ± 7.6 versus 49.9 ± 7.2 mmHg, respectively, P = 0.0007. A different TcCO2 behavior was found according to the random sequence: in patients starting on nCPAP, TcCO2 significantly decreased from 50.0 ± 8.0 to 46.6 ± 7.5 mmHg during nHFOV (P = 0.001). In patients starting on nHFOV, TcCO2 slightly increased from 48.5 ± 7.8 to 49.9 ± 6.7 mmHg during nCPAP (P = 0.13).ConclusionsnHFOV delivered through nasal prongs is more effective than nCPAP in improving the elimination of CO2 .© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…