• J Clin Epidemiol · Sep 2016

    Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements.

    • Joost B Nieuwenhuis, Elaine Irving, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Emily Lloyd, Iris Goetz, Diederick E Grobbee, Pieter Stolk, Rolf H H Groenwold, Zuidgeest Mira G P MG Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, the Netherlands. Electronic ad, and work package 3 of the GetReal consortium.
    • Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, the Netherlands.
    • J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Sep 1; 77: 95-100.

    ObjectivesTo illustrate how pragmatic trial design elements or inserting explanatory trial elements in pragmatic trials affect validity, generalizability, precision, and operational feasibility.Study Design And SettingFrom illustrative examples identified through the IMI Get Real Consortium, we selected randomized drug trials with a pragmatic design feature. We searched all publications on these trials for information on how pragmatic trial design features affect validity, generalizability, precision, or feasibility.ResultsWe present examples from the Salford lung study, International Suicide Prevention Trial, Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression, and Cluster Randomized Usual care vs. Caduet Investigation Assessing Long-term-risk trial. These examples show that incorporating pragmatic trial design elements in trials may affect generalizability, precision and validity and may lead to operational challenges different from traditional explanatory trials. Inserting explanatory trial elements into pragmatic trials may also affect validity, generalizability, and operational feasibility, especially when these trial elements are incorporated in one arm of the trial only. Design choices that positively affect one of these domains (e.g., generalizability) may negatively affect others (e.g., feasibility).ConclusionConsequences of incorporating pragmatic or explanatory trial design elements in pragmatic trials should be explicitly considered and balanced for all relevant domains, including validity, generalizability, precision, and operational feasibility. Tools are needed to make these consequences more transparent.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…