• J Gen Intern Med · Feb 2022

    Effect of an eHealth intervention on older adults' quality of life and health-related outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.

    • David H Gustafson, Rachel Kornfield, Marie-Louise Mares, Darcie C Johnston, Olivia J Cody, Ellie Fan Yang, Juwon Hwang, Jane E Mahoney, John J Curtin, Alexander Tahk, and Dhavan V Shah.
    • Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb 1; 37 (3): 521-530.

    BackgroundBy 2030, the number of US adults age ≥65 will exceed 70 million. Their quality of life has been declared a national priority by the US government.ObjectiveAssess effects of an eHealth intervention for older adults on quality of life, independence, and related outcomes.DesignMulti-site, 2-arm (1:1), non-blinded randomized clinical trial. Recruitment November 2013 to May 2015; data collection through November 2016.SettingThree Wisconsin communities (urban, suburban, and rural).ParticipantsPurposive community-based sample, 390 adults age ≥65 with health challenges.Exclusionslong-term care, inability to get out of bed/chair unassisted.InterventionAccess (vs. no access) to interactive website (ElderTree) designed to improve quality of life, social connection, and independence.MeasuresPrimary outcome: quality of life (PROMIS Global Health). Secondary: independence (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living); social support (MOS Social Support); depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8); falls prevention (Falls Behavioral Scale). Moderation: healthcare use (Medical Services Utilization). Both groups completed all measures at baseline, 6, and 12 months.ResultsThree hundred ten participants (79%) completed the 12-month survey. There were no main effects of ElderTree over time. Moderation analyses indicated that among participants with high primary care use, ElderTree (vs. control) led to better trajectories for mental quality of life (OR=0.32, 95% CI 0.10-0.54, P=0.005), social support received (OR=0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.29, P=0.007), social support provided (OR=0.29, 95% CI 0.13-0.45, P<0.001), and depression (OR= -0.20, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.01, P=0.034). Supplemental analyses suggested ElderTree may be more effective among people with multiple (vs. 0 or 1) chronic conditions.LimitationsOnce randomized, participants were not blind to the condition; self-reports may be subject to memory bias.ConclusionInterventions like ET may help improve quality of life and socio-emotional outcomes among older adults with more illness burden. Our next study focuses on this population.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov ; registration ID number: NCT02128789.© 2021. The Author(s).

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…