• Tomoaki Alex Kinukawa, Koji Inui, Tomoya Taniguchi, Nobuyuki Takeuchi, Shunsuke Sugiyama, Makoto Nishihara, Kimitoshi Nishiwaki, and Ryusuke Kakigi.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan. Electronic address: t-kinukawa@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.
• Neuroscience. 2021 Aug 1; 468: 168-175.

AbstractAlthough conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is considered to represent descending pain inhibitory mechanisms triggered by noxious stimuli applied to a remote area, there have been no previous studies comparing CPM between pain and tactile systems. In this study, we compared CPM between the two systems objectively using blink reflexes. Intra-epidermal electrical stimulation (IES) and transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TS) were applied to the right skin area over the supraorbital foramen to evoke a nociceptive or a non-nociceptive blink reflex, respectively, in 15 healthy males. In the test session, IES or TS were applied six times and subjects reported the intensity of each stimulus on a numerical rating scale (NRS). Blink reflexes were measured using electromyography (R2). The first and second sessions were control sessions, while in the third session, the left hand was immersed in cold water at 10 °C as a conditioning stimulus. The magnitude of the R2 blink and NRS scores were compared among the sessions by 2-way ANOVA. Both the NRS score and nociceptive R2 were significantly decreased in the third session for IES, with a significant correlation between the two variables; whereas, TS-induced non-nociceptive R2 did not change among the sessions. Although the conditioning stimulus decreased the NRS score for TS, the CPM effect was significantly smaller than that for IES (p = 0.002). The present findings suggest the presence of a pain-specific CPM effect to a heterotopic noxious stimulus.Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…