• S H Pennefather, S Gilby, A Danecki, and G N Russell.
• Consultant, Department of Anaesthesia, Cardiothoracic Centre, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE. stephen.pennefather@ctc.nhs.uk
• Anaesthesia. 2006 Apr 1; 61 (4): 363-9.

AbstractThe clinical governance framework and medico-legal climate in the United Kingdom has changed significantly in the past 7 years. We used a postal questionnaire to survey thoracic epidural practice in the United Kingdom in 1997 and repeated this survey in 2004. The response rate to both surveys was 59-60%. There has been considerable change in respect of taking specific consent for thoracic epidural analgesia (24% in 1997, 74% in 2004), awake epidural cannulation (40% in 1997, 84% in 2004), availability of an acute pain service (47% in 1997, 95% in 2004) and HDU-only nursing of patients (63% in 1997, 30% in 2004). Of the 2004 respondents, < 1% used the newer, less toxic local anaesthetics, 49% would consider inserting a thoracic epidural in patients receiving clopidogrel, and 34% would consider inserting a thoracic epidural in patients receiving both aspirin and clopidogrel. A central register of thoracic epidural complications would assist in further developing practice.

25 keywords...

hide…