-
Comparative Study
FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 in Japanese participants of the community-based annual health check: the Takahata study.
- Hiroyuki Kishi, Yoko Shibata, Daisuke Osaka, Shuichi Abe, Sumito Inoue, Yoshikane Tokairin, Akira Igarashi, Keiko Yamauchi, Tomomi Kimura, Michiko Sato, Yasuko Aida, Tetsu Watanabe, Tsuneo Konta, Sumio Kawata, Takeo Kato, and Isao Kubota.
- Department of Cardiology, Pulmonology, and Nephrology, Yamagata University School of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
- Intern. Med. 2011 Jan 1; 50 (2): 879387-93.
BackgroundForced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV(6)) is becoming a substitute of forced vital capacity (FVC). However, the Japanese predictive equation for FEV(6) has not been established, and the validity for the use of FEV(1)/FEV(6) for diagnosing airflow limitation in Japanese has not been confirmed.MethodsSubjects aged 40 or older, who had participated in a community-based health check in Takahata, Japan, from 2004 through 2005, were enrolled. The smoking histories of these subjects were investigated using a self-reporting questionnaire. FVC, FEV(1), and FEV(6) were measured using spirometric machines. Predictive equations of FEV(6) were obtained from never-smoking subjects without history of pulmonary diseases by multiple linear regression assay.ResultsFEV(6) and FEV(1)/FEV(6) were significantly correlated with FVC (r=0.998, p<0.001) and FEV(1)/FVC (r=0.989, p<0.001), respectively. The cutoff values of percent predicted (%) FEV(6) and FEV(1)/FEV(6) for discrimination of having the restrictive lung disorder determined by %FVC <0.8 and having the airflow limitation determined by FEV(1)/FVC <0.7 were 0.80 and 0.72, respectively (%FEV(6): sensitivity=0.995, specificity=0.983, positive predictive value
=0.832, negative predictive value =1.000; FEV(1)/FEV(6): sensitivity=0.942; specificity=0.971; PPV=0.787; NPV=0.993). When the 5th percentile the lower limit of normal values was used as criterion for discrimination of having airflow limitation, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of FEV(1)/FEV(6) were 0.932, 0.985, 0.808, and 0.995, respectively.ConclusionThe results of the present study suggest that %FEV(6) and FEV(1)/FEV(6) are excellent substitutes for %FVC and FEV(1)/FVC, respectively. We confirmed the validity of the use of FEV(6) and FEV(1)/FEV(6) for identifying pulmonary diseases in Japanese individuals. Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.