• Lei Li, Xuan Liu, Fei Shen, Naxin Xu, Yun Li, Kun Xu, Junping Li, and Yong Liu.
• Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 16; 101 (50): e32246e32246.

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension to explore more suitable training.MethodsPubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and VIP databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published between January 2002 and November 2022. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were selected as the effect scale indices for the evaluation of the differences in post-intervention systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), heart rate, maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max), and flow-mediated vasodilation. All these were compared using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 14.0.ResultsA total of 13 randomized controlled trials and 442 patients were included. The meta-analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between HIIT and MICT in improving SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension. Subgroup analyses revealed that HIIT was better than MICT in reducing SBP during daytime monitoring (WMD = -4.14, 95%CI: [-6.98, -1.30], P < .001). In addition, HIIT increased flow-mediated vasodilation more than MICT in hypertensive patients (WMD = 2.75, 95%CI: [0.43, 5.07], P = .02).ConclusionHIIT and MICT have similar effects on the overall resting SBP and DBP in patients with hypertension and prehypertension. However, HIIT is better than MICT at reducing SBP during daytime monitoring. In addition, HIIT can improve vasodilation.Copyright © 2022 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

17 keywords...

hide…