• Jamie R Hill, Sebastian Kelm, Jiye Shi, and Charlotte M Deane.
• Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, 1 South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3TG, UK.
• Bioinformatics. 2011 Jul 1;27(13):i15-23.

MotivationMembrane proteins are both abundant and important in cells, but the small number of solved structures restricts our understanding of them. Here we consider whether membrane proteins undergo different substitutions from their soluble counterparts and whether these can be used to improve membrane protein alignments, and therefore improve prediction of their structure.ResultsWe construct substitution tables for different environments within membrane proteins. As data is scarce, we develop a general metric to assess the quality of these asymmetric tables. Membrane proteins show markedly different substitution preferences from soluble proteins. For example, substitution preferences in lipid tail-contacting parts of membrane proteins are found to be distinct from all environments in soluble proteins, including buried residues. A principal component analysis of the tables identifies the greatest variation in substitution preferences to be due to changes in hydrophobicity; the second largest variation relates to secondary structure. We demonstrate the use of our tables in pairwise sequence-to-structure alignments (also known as 'threading') of membrane proteins using the FUGUE alignment program. On average, in the 10-25% sequence identity range, alignments are improved by 28 correctly aligned residues compared with alignments made using FUGUE's default substitution tables. Our alignments also lead to improved structural models.AvailabilitySubstitution tables are available at: http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/proteins/resources.

16 keywords...

hide…