• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Feb 2024

    Review Meta Analysis

    Dexamethasone doses in patients with COVID-19 and hypoxia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    • Marie Warrer Munch, Anders Granholm, Jan Maláska, Jan Stašek, Pablo O Rodriguez, Tyler Pitre, Rebecca Wilson, Jelena Savović, Bram Rochwerg, Adam Svobodnik, Milan Kratochvíl, Manuel Taboada, Vivekanand Jha, VijayaraghavanBharath Kumar TirupakuzhiBKTThe George Institute for Global Health, New Delhi, India.Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai, India., Sheila Nainan Myatra, Balasubramanian Venkatesh, Anders Perner, and MøllerMorten HylanderMH0000-0002-6378-9673Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.Collaboration for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark..
    • Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2024 Feb 1; 68 (2): 146166146-166.

    BackgroundThe optimal dose of dexamethasone for severe/critical COVID-19 is uncertain. We compared higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia.MethodsWe searched PubMed and trial registers until 23 June 2023 for randomised clinical trials comparing higher (>6 mg) versus standard doses (6 mg) of dexamethasone in adults with COVID-19 and hypoxia. The primary outcome was mortality at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were mortality closest to 90 days; days alive without life support; and the occurrence of serious adverse events/reactions (SAEs/SARs) closest to 1 month. We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, risk of random errors using trial sequential analysis, and certainty of evidence using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).ResultsWe included eight trials (2478 participants), of which four (1293 participants) had low risk of bias. Higher doses of dexamethasone probably resulted in little to no difference in mortality at 1 month (relative risk [RR] 0.97, 95% CI: 0.79-1.19), mortality closest to Day 90 (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.86-1.20), and SAEs/SARs (RR 1.00, 95% CI: 0.97-1.02). Higher doses of dexamethasone probably increased the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support but had no effect on days alive without renal replacement therapy.ConclusionsBased on low to moderate certainty evidence, higher versus standard doses of dexamethasone probably result in little to no difference in mortality, SAEs/SARs, and days alive without renal replacement therapy, but probably increase the number of days alive without invasive mechanical ventilation and circulatory support.© 2023 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…