• J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 2024

    Review

    A Systematic Scoping Review on Dignity Assessment Tools.

    • Yun Xue Lim, Elaine Li Ying Quah, Keith Zi Yuan Chua, Casper Keegan Lin Ronggui, Ranitha Govindasamy, Simone Meiqi Ong, Eng Koon Ong, PhuaGillian Li GekGLGDivision of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Lien Centre for Palliative Care (G.L.G.P.), Duke-NUS Medical School, Si, and KrishnaLalit Kumar RadhaLKRYong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K..
    • Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., S.M.O., L.K.R.R), National University of Singapore, Singapore; Division of Supportive and Palliative Care (Y.X.L., E.L-Y.Q., K.Z-Y.C., C.K.L.R., S.M.O., E.K.O., G.L.K.P., L.K.R.R), National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
    • J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Apr 1; 67 (4): e263e284e263-e284.

    ContextThe provision of person-centered dignity-conserving care is central to palliative care. It is important to reevaluate current methods of assessing dignity as the concept of dignity is multifaceted.ObjectivesThe aim of this study is to understand the tools which are used to assess a patient's dignity and the elements of dignity evaluated in these tools.MethodsTwo independent and concurrent Systematic Evidence-Based Approach guided systematic scoping reviews (SSR in SEBA) on existing dignity assessment tools and on accounts of assessments of dignity were carried out. The SSR in SEBA on dignity assessment tools involving PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and CINAHL databases saw 22 full-text articles included from the 645 articles reviewed. The SSR in SEBA on accounts of assessments of dignity featured in the PubMed database identified 102 full-text articles which saw 46 articles included.ResultsThe domains identified were factors affecting patients' definition of dignity; elements of dignity-conserving care; and components of effective tools.ConclusionCurrent accounts to assess dignity and assessment tools fail to capture shifting self-concepts of dignity holistically. A portfolio-like appraisal of dignity is proposed to achieve assessments that are timely, longitudinal, and patient-specific. Portfolio-based assessments by members of the multidisciplinary team will better direct timely evaluations of relevant aspects of changing concepts of dignity, without losing the patient's holistic perception of dignity.Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…