• World Neurosurg · Mar 2024

    Review

    Long-term outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review.

    • Samuel D Pettersson, Mohamed K Elrafie, Jakub Makarewicz, Tomasz Klepinowski, Paulina Skrzypkowska, Jean Filo, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, Thomas Fodor, Tzak Lau, Tomasz Szmuda, Michael Young, and Christopher S Ogilvy.
    • Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
    • World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar 25.

    BackgroundThe long-term outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) remain poorly understood given the paucity of longitudinal studies. A systematic review was conducted to pool cumulative incidences for all outcomes.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were queried to systematically extract potential references. The articles relating to AVMs treated via SRS were required to be written in English, involve pediatric patients (<18 years of age), and include a mean follow-up period of >5 years. Individual patient data were obtained to construct a pooled Kaplan-Meier plot on obliteration rates over time.ResultsAmong the 6 studies involving 1315 pediatric patients averaging a follow-up period of 86.6 months (range, 6-276), AVM obliteration was observed in 66.1% with cumulative probabilities of 48.28% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.89-54.68), 76.11% (95% CI, 67.50-84.72), 77.48% (95% CI, 66.37-88.59) over 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The cumulative incidence of post-SRS hemorrhage, tumors, cysts, and de novo seizures was 7.2%, 0.3%, 1.6%, and 1.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of radiation-induced necrosis, edema, radiologic radiation-induced changes (RICs), symptomatic RICs, and permanent RICs were 8.0%, 1.4%, 28.0%, 8.7%, and 4.9%, respectively.ConclusionsStudies assessing long-term outcomes after SRS are moderate in quality and retrospective. Thus, interpretation with caution is advised given the variable degree of loss to follow-up, which suggests that complication rates may be higher than the values stated in the literature. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.