• Patrick Elias, Bernarda Cavka, Peter Turner, Anuruthran Ambikaipalan, Emily Cross, Emily Kong, Kirsty Gibb, Yi Yang, Nathan Anderson, Alper Yataganbaba, and John Cunningham.
• Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3050, Australia.
• Spine. 2024 Apr 29.

Study DesignThis was a retrospective cohort study.ObjectiveTo determine the proportion of referrals diverted by the SVFC from traditional outpatient clinic management.Summary Of Background DataThe consistent rise in demand for orthopaedic outpatient clinic services is creating marked challenges to the provision of quality care. Virtual fracture clinics for upper and lower limb fractures have reduced the burden on outpatient clinics through telephone-based management of these conditions. To date, no study describes the expansion of virtual care to the spine trauma population.MethodsA study of spine fractures referred to the RMH Department of Orthopaedic Surgery was conducted comparing outcomes prior to (January to December 2021) and following (July 2022 to November 2023) implementation of a spine virtual fracture clinic (SVFC). The primary aim of this study was to investigate the effects of a telephone-based SVFC on outpatient clinic activity, represented by the proportion of referrals discharged without requiring in-person clinic review. Secondary aims included appointment utilisation, lost to follow-up rates, duration of care, missed or mis-diagnoses, unplanned operations and complications.ResultsA total of 91.9% (n=666) referrals managed by the SVFC were discharged without in-person clinic attendance. Compared to outpatient clinic management (n=150 referrals), SVFC implementation was associated with reductions in the average number of consultations per referral (1.8 versus 2.4, P<0.001), appointments not attended (5% versus 13%, P<0.001), referrals lost to follow-up (0 versus 10.7%, P<0.001) and a shorter duration of care (median 48 d versus 58 d, P<0.001). A total of 65 patients (8.1%) were redirected to in-person clinics of which three underwent surgical intervention. No diagnostic errors, complications or adverse events were identified.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that a SVFC is an effective and safe alternative pathway to traditional hospital-based outpatient clinics with low-risk for any adverse outcomes.Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

6 keywords...

hide…