• Justin J Sanders, Emily Benotti, Carolina Jaramillo, Bukiwe Sihlongonyane, Nora Downey, Suzanne Mitchell, Katherine R Sterba, Elise C Carey, Diane Meier, Namita S Mohta, Erik Fromme, and Joanna Paladino.
• Ariadne Labs (J.J.S., E.B., C.J., B.S., N.D., N.S.M., E.F., J.P.), Boston, MA, USA; McGill University (J.J.S.), Montreal, QC, Canada. Electronic address: justin.sanders@mcgill.ca.
• J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Sep 1; 68 (3): 214222.e6214-222.e6.

ContextInterventions to improve the quality of care for people affected by serious illness commonly fail to reach patients from marginalized and underserved communities, which include those characterized by racialized or indigenous identity, sexual and gender minority status, and rural living. Interventions to improve care through serious illness conversations have demonstrated benefit, but little is known about their implementation in health systems that predominantly serve these patient groups.ObjectivesThe study aimed to understand factors influencing implementation of a serious illness communication-focused intervention-the Serious Illness Care Program in health systems who primarily provide care to marginalized and underserved communities.MethodsQualitative interviews (16) and focus groups (3) were conducted with 19 interdisciplinary team members from six geographically diverse U.S. healthcare systems. Using a template analysis approach, investigators coded data inductively and deductively to identify themes.ResultsThree themes emerged: patient factors, intervention elements, and health system contextual factors. Participants highlighted mission-driven efforts, creativity, interprofessional practice, and trainees as enablers of success. They identified weaknesses in the intervention's communication tool-the Serious Illness Conversation Guide as barriers to implementation of conversations. Resource constraints, socio-economic vulnerability, and mistrust in the health system were seen as additional barriers.ConclusionsHealth systems that provide care to underserved and marginalized communities face unique challenges implementing the Serious Illness Care Program. They also possess assets, some unique to these settings, that support program adoption. Findings suggest that implementation of similar programs in low-resource healthcare settings may help address unmet needs among marginalized populations.Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…