-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Cricoid pressure: are two hands better than one?
- T M Cook.
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal United Hospital, Bath.
- Anaesthesia. 1996 Apr 1;51(4):365-8.
AbstractOne hundred and twenty patients were studied to compare the view of the larynx at laryngoscopy with one- or two-handed cricoid pressure applied. A blinded crossover technique was employed. When the grade of laryngeal view achieved with either type of cricoid pressure was compared using a 4-point scale there was no significant difference. However, when the views were compared with greater discrimination the laryngeal view achieved with one-handed cricoid pressure was significantly better than that seen with two-handed cricoid pressure. There was no significant difference between the groups in the need for a gum elastic bougie to facilitate intubation. A two-handed technique has been advocated to improve intubation conditions when cricoid pressure is required. It has several disadvantages, its efficacy has not been proven and this study suggests it does not improve the view at laryngoscopy. Two-handed cricoid pressure should no longer be advocated unless an advantage over one-handed cricoid pressure can be shown.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..