• Qing Li, Shan Shen, and Ming Lei.
• Department of Neurology, Wuhan Brain Hospital, General Hospital of Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
• Brit J Hosp Med. 2024 Dec 30; 85 (12): 1211-21.

AbstractAims/Background Arterial spin labelling (ASL) is a non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method. ASL techniques can quantitatively measure cerebral perfusion by fitting a kinetic model to the difference between labelled images (tag images) and ones which are acquired without labelling (control images). ASL functional MRI (fMRI) provides quantitative perfusion maps by using arterial water as an endogenous tracer instead of depending on vascular blood oxygenation level.This study aimed to assess the number of pulsed ASL blocks that were needed to provide accurate and reliable regional estimates of cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes when participants engaged in visually guided saccade and fixation task; evaluate the localization to cortical control saccade versus fixation; investigate the relationship between the sensitivity of ASL fMRI and the number of blocks; and compare the sensitivity of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI and ASL fMRI. Methods The experiment was a block-design paradigm consisting of two conditions: fixation and saccade. No response other than the eye movements of the participants was recorded during the scans. ASL and BOLD fMRI scans were conducted on all participants during the same session. The fMRI study consisted of two functional experiments: a CBF contrast was provided using the ASL sequence, and an optimized BOLD contrast was provided using the BOLD sequence. Results From group analysis in all divided blocks of ASL sessions (4, 6, 8...... 14, 16, 18......26, 28, 30), ASL yielded significant activation clusters in the visual cortex of the bilateral hemisphere from block 4. There was no false activation from block 4. No activation cluster was found by reversing analysis of block 2. Robust and consistent activation in the visual cortex was observed in each of the 14 divided blocks group analysis, and no activation was found in the eye field of the brain. The sensitivity of 4-block was found to be better than that of 8-block. More significant activation clusters of the visual cortex were found in BOLD than in ASL. No activation cluster of parietal eye field (PEF), frontal eye field (FEF) and supplementary eye field (SEF) was detected in ASL. The voxel size of the activation cluster increased with the increasing number of blocks, and the percent signal change in the activation cluster decreased with the escalating block number. The voxel size was positively correlated with the number of blocks (correlation coefficient = 0.98, p < 0.0001), and the percent signal change negatively correlated with the number of blocks (correlation coefficient = -0.90, p < 0.0001). Conclusion The 4-block pulsed functional ASL (fASL) presents accurate and reliable activation, with minimal time-on-task effect and little adverse impact of time, in participants engaging in visually guided saccade and fixation tasks. Despite having lower sensitivity than BOLD fMRI, ASL can determine accurate activation location. Although the time-on-task effects affect the observation for the sensitivity of ASL over task time, it is suggested that ASL fMRI may provide a powerful method for pinpointing the time-on-task effect over a long period of time.

19 keywords...

hide…