-
- Ory Haisraely, Marcia L Jaffe, Yaacov Lawrence, Zvi Symon, Anton Whol, Thaila Kaisman-Elbaz, Zvi Cohen, Alicia Taliansky, and Orit Kaidar-Person.
- Radiation oncology department, Sheba Medical Center; School of medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Science, Tel -Aviv University. Electronic address: Ory.haisraely@sheba.gov.il.
- World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan 29: 123704123704.
IntroductionSpinal meningiomas (SM) are rare, predominantly benign tumors that account for 1.2-12.7% of all meningiomas. While surgical resection is the primary treatment, recurrence occurs in a subset of patients, necessitating subsequent therapies such as re-operation or definitive radiation therapy (RT). This study evaluates the outcomes of definitive RT versus third surgery for recurrent WHO grade 1 SM, focusing on progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related toxicities.MethodsA retrospective review of 48 patients with third progression of WHO grade 1 SM was conducted between 2008 and 2021. Inclusion criteria required prior second surgery and a confirmed pathology of WHO grade 1. Patients who received RT after earlier surgeries or whose pathology upgraded to WHO grade 2 or 3 were excluded. Data on demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, and RT parameters were analyzed. PFS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and treatment-related toxicities were recorded.ResultsOf the 48 patients, 31 underwent third surgery, and 17 received definitive RT (median dose: 54Gy in 30 fractions). Median follow-up was 30 months. PFS at 36 months was comparable between surgery (77.4%) and RT (76.4%). Tumor size was larger in the surgery group (median 1.8 cm vs. 1 cm, p<0.001). Neurological improvements were noted in 79.1% of surgery patients and 58.3% of RT patients. RT offered superior pain control, with no cases of radiation myelopathy observed.ConclusionDefinitive RT appears to be a feasible alternative to third surgery for recurrent SM in selected patients, providing comparable PFS and manageable toxicities. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and refine treatment approaches for recurrent SM.Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.