-
- Alda Daniela García-Guzmán, Liliana Velasco-Hidalgo, Salvador Ortiz-Gutiérrez, Diana Monserrat Aquino-Luna, Sandra Nayeli Becerra-Morales, Kenya Shamira Carmona-Jaimez, Martha Guevara-Cruz, Beatriz Adriana Pinzón-Navarro, Daffne Danae Baldwin-Monroy, Rocío Del Socorro Cárdenas-Cardos, Marta Margarita Zapata-Tarrés, and Isabel Medina-Vera.
- Servicio de Oncología Médica, Instituto Nacional de Pediatría; Ciudad de México, Mexico; Tecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud; Ciudad de México, Mexico.
- Nutrition. 2025 Jan 7; 132: 112685112685.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability, construct, and criterion validity of the screening tool for childhood cancer (SCAN), stratified by age in oncology patients admitted to a tertiary referral hospital.MethodsHospitalized children from birth to 18 years old, with an oncological diagnosis and expected length of stay (LOS) of >24 hours were included. Interrater and intrarrater agreements were used to evaluate the reliability of SCAN. Construct validity and criterion validity were explored in SCAN. Also, predictive validity was explored by comparing SCAN risk categories against LOS.ResultsThree hundred ninety-four children were included in the study. The scores obtained after dietitians and physicians used SCAN showed good agreement (ICC = 0.80, 95%CI 0.71-0.86, P < 0.001). The intrarrater agreement within the evaluation of the same dietitian to the same group of patients was also good (ICC = 0.83, 95%CI 0.75-0.88, P < 0.001). After applying SCAN, 66.2% of participants scored >3 points, classified as at risk of malnutrition. The agreement observed when comparing the risk classification given by the tool with the malnutrition assessment using anthropometry variables as the criterion reference was fair (κ = 0.22, 95%CI 0.15-0.29, P < 0.001). Predictive validity indicated a slight agreement (κ = 0.16, 95%CI 0.08-0.25, P < 0.001) between malnutrition risk by SCAN and LOS. When assessing construct validity, comparing the scores given by SCAN with those provided by STRONGkids, a fair agreement was found (κ = 0.21, 95%CI 0.15-0.26, P < 0.001).ConclusionsOur results show that SCAN is a reliable and valid tool for detecting malnutrition in oncology pediatric patients upon hospital admission.Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.