• G M Stocks, S P Hallworth, and R Fernando.
• Research Fellow in Obstetric Anaesthesia, and Consultant Anaesthetist, Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
• Anaesthesia. 2000 Dec 1;55(12):1185-8.

AbstractSuccess of the 'needle-through-needle' technique for combined spinal epidural analgesia requires the immobilisation of the spinal needle during intrathecal injection. A device that achieves this was evaluated in 200 labouring women, randomly allocated to receive a combined spinal epidural using the CSEcure(R) (SIMS Portex, UK) locking needle or a conventional, non-locking technique. Data collection included the incidence of dural click as the spinal needle penetrated the dura mater, presence of cerebrospinal fluid in the spinal needle hub and the number of technical failures with the spinal component. Successful dural punctures with the spinal needle were similar for locking and non-locking needles (99.0 vs. 98.0%; p = 0.55), despite a small but significant reduction in dural click with the locking needle compared with the non-locking technique (97. 0 vs. 84.7%; p < 0.01). Although not statistically significant, there was a higher number of technical failures, mainly due to spinal needle movement, in the non-locking group (9.1 vs. 3.1%; p = 0.08). The locking needle device may be a useful alternative to conventional methods for combined spinal epidural analgesia.

17 keywords...

hide…