• Brandon G Santoni, Bradley J Hindman, Christian M Puttlitz, Julie B Weeks, Nathaniel Johnson, Mazen A Maktabi, and Michael M Todd.
• Department of Mechanical Engineering, Orthopaedic Bioengineering Research Laboratory, Colorado State University, USA.
• Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan 1;110(1):24-31.

BackgroundManual in-line stabilization (MILS) is recommended during direct laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with known or suspected cervical spine instability. Because MILS impairs glottic visualization, the authors hypothesized that anesthesiologists would apply greater pressure during intubations with MILS than without.MethodsNine anesthetized and pharmacologically paralyzed patients underwent two sequential laryngoscopies and intubations, one with MILS and one without, in random order. A transducer array along a Macintosh 3 laryngoscope blade continuously measured applied pressures, and glottic view was characterized.ResultsWith MILS, glottic visualization was worse in six patients, and intubation failure occurred in two of these six patients. Maximum laryngoscope pressure at best glottic view was greater with MILS than without (717 +/- 339 mmHg vs. 363 +/- 121 mmHg, respectively; n = 8; P = 0.023). Other measures of pressure application also indicated comparable increases with MILS.ConclusionPressures applied to airway tissues by the laryngoscope blade are secondarily transmitted to the cervical spine and result in cranio-cervical motion. In the presence of cervical instability, impaired glottic visualization and secondary increases in pressure application with MILS have the potential to increase pathologic cranio-cervical motion.

16 keywords...

hide…