• Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. · May 2006

    Review Comparative Study

    Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: imaging of the spine.

    • Vaishali V Phalke, Sachin Gujar, and Douglas J Quint.
    • Division of Neuroradiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. vrchoksi@med.umich.edu
    • Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 2006 May 1;16(2):241-8, ix.

    Abstract3 T MR imaging brings with it the possibility of a doubled signal-to-noise ratio compared with 1.5 T systems and the possibility of decreased scan times without reduction in quality. Higher cost and other issues however, also need to be examined.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…