• Spine · Sep 2005

    Comparative Study

    Monaxial versus multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws in the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

    • Timothy R Kuklo, Benjamin K Potter, David W Polly, and Lawrence G Lenke.
    • Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC 20307, USA. Timothy.Kuklo@na.amedd.army.mil
    • Spine. 2005 Sep 15; 30 (18): 2113-20.

    Study DesignRadiographic outcome analysis following thoracic fusion of Lenke Type I adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves with segmental pedicle screw fixation.ObjectiveTo compare the correctional capacity of monaxial versus multiaxial pedicle screws in a matched cohort of AIS patients.Summary Of Background DataThoracic pedicle screws provide improved curve correction over hook and wire or hybrid constructs for AIS. Further, both monaxial and multiaxial screws are available, with each offering certain advantages over the other. However, different screw types have not been evaluated against each other.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the preoperative and final postoperative follow-up radiographs of an age- and curve-matched cohort of 35 consecutive Lenke Type I AIS patients. Fifteen were treated with monaxial and 20 were treated with multiaxial pedicle screw constructs. All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. The average age at surgery was 14 years 4 months (range, 12-17 years) in the monaxial group and 13 years 8 months (12-16 years) in the multiaxial group. Evaluation included coronal proximal thoracic (PT), main thoracic (MT), and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angles and flexibility indexes, regional sagittal curvature, the sagittal apical rib hump (RH) deformity, the apical vertebral body-rib ratio (AVB-R: ratio of linear measures from left and right apical body to lateral rib), and the apical rib spread distance (ARSD, difference of the sums of the intercostal distances at the five periapical segments measured at the lateral transverse process).ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference with regard to the preoperative PT curves, MT curves, TL/L curves, flexibility indexes, regional sagittal curvature, AVB-R, or ARSD. The preoperative rib humps were significantly greater in the monaxial screw group (42.4 mm vs. 34.7 mm; P = 0.02). Postoperative follow-up averaged 59.9 months (range, 24-98 months) for the monaxial group and 38.0 months (range, 24-55 months) for the multiaxial group (P < 0.0001). An average of 7.7 vertebral levels were fused in the monaxial group compared with 7.2 levels in the multiaxial group (P = 0.39). After surgery, both constructs provided excellent instrumented correction of the MT curves (64.9% vs. 60.0% for the monaxial and multiaxial groups, respectively; P = 0.33), as well as good spontaneous correction of the PT (41.3% vs. 40.5%; P = 0.92) and TL/L curves (55.4% vs. 51.7%; P = 0.66). Monaxial screws demonstrated significantly greater absolute (13.9 mm vs. 25.2 mm; P < 0.0001) and relative (66.1% vs. 24.7%; P < 0.0001) correction of the apical RH. Additionally, AVB-R (77.9% vs. 54.1%; P = 0.0007) and ARSD (82.8% vs. 69.9%; P = 0.04) corrections were significantly greater in the monaxial group. There were no neurologic deficits or major complications in either group.ConclusionBoth monaxial and multiaxial thoracic pedicle screws provide excellent coronal deformity correction for thoracic fusion of main thoracic AIS. Monaxial screws provide superior derotation and restoration of thoracic symmetry as noted by significantly greater correction of the AVB-R, RH, and ARSD.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.