• Spine · Nov 2010

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study

    Coaptive film versus subcuticular suture: comparing skin closure time after posterior spinal instrumented fusion in pediatric patients with spinal deformity.

    • Brian E Grottkau, Gleeson Rebello, Gabriel Merlin, and Jonathan M Winograd.
    • Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children, Boston, MA 02114, USA. bgrottkau@partners.org
    • Spine. 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2027-9.

    Study DesignA prospective, randomized trial comparing skin closure time between coaptive film and subcuticular Monocryl sutures in children undergoing posterior instrumented spinal fusion.ObjectiveTo prospectively compare skin closure time, complication rate and cosmetic result between coaptive film and subcuticular Monocryl wound closures in pediatric spine surgery.Summary Of Background DataPosterior instrumented spinal fusions for spinal deformity in children are time-consuming ventures that are demanding on both the patient and physician. Minimizing the time for skin closure at the end of prolonged surgery diminishes the physical burden on the surgeon, the operating room personnel, and reduces operating room costs.MethodsTwenty-five children (mean age, 14.1 year) underwent posterior instrumented spinal fusion. Twenty-five incisions in 25 patients (12 closed with 3-0 subcuticular Monocryl sutures, 13 closed with coaptive film [Steri Strip S; 3 M company]) were evaluated. The method of skin closure was randomized before beginning the procedure and the surgeon informed just before skin closure. Closure time was recorded. A blinded plastic surgeon using a visual analogue scale assessed the cosmetic results at a minimum 3-month follow-up.ResultsIncisions closed with coaptive film required less time to complete than incisions closed with subcuticular suture. The mean time for skin closure using coaptive film was 290.62 seconds compared to the mean time of 674.75 seconds using Monocryl sutures (P < 0.000001). The average length of incisions closed with coaptive film was similar to the corresponding incisions that were closed with subcuticular Monocryl sutures (30.8 and 34.0 cm, respectively, P = 0.22). There was no significant difference in the cosmetic results or the number of wound complications using either technique.ConclusionCoaptive film is a time-saving option for skin closure following pediatric spine surgery with comparable cosmetic results and no difference in complication rates.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…