• S-C Ko, H Zhang, J J Haitsma, K-C Cheng, C-F Li, and A S Slutsky.
• The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008 Apr 1;52(4):514-21.

BackgroundDifferent levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with and without a recruitment maneuver (RM) may have a significant impact on ventilator-induced lung injury but this issue has not been well addressed.MethodsAnesthetized rats received hydrochloric acid (HCl, pH 1.5) aspiration, followed by mechanical ventilation with a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg. The animals were randomized into four groups of 10 each: (1) high PEEP at 6 cm H(2)O with an RM by applying peak airway pressure at 30 cm H(2)O for 10 s every 15 min; (2) low PEEP at 2 cm H(2)O with RM; (3) high PEEP alone; and (4) low PEEP alone.ResultsThe mean arterial pressure and the amounts of fluid infused were similar in the four groups. Application of the higher PEEP improved oxygenation compared with the lower PEEP groups (P<0.05). The lung compliance was better reserved, and the systemic cytokine responses and lung wet to dry ratio were lower in the high PEEP than in the low PEEP group for a given RM (P<0.05).ConclusionsThe use of a combination of periodic RM and the higher PEEP had an additive effect in improving oxygenation and pulmonary mechanics and attenuation of inflammation.

29 keywords...

hide…