• Br J Anaesth · Nov 1993

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Comparison of 0.125% bupivacaine with 0.125% bupivacaine and clonidine as extradural analgesia in the first stage of labour.

    • M E O'Meara and T Gin.
    • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sha Tin.
    • Br J Anaesth. 1993 Nov 1;71(5):651-6.

    AbstractWe have studied 42 healthy parturients with singleton vertex pregnancies, who were in the first stage of labour and requesting extradural analgesia. They were allocated randomly in a double-blind fashion to receive either 0.125% bupivacaine plain or 0.125% bupivacaine with clonidine 120 micrograms. Efficacy of analgesia was evaluated using linear visual analogue scoring (VAS), sensory block was assessed using bilateral pinprick in the mid-clavicular line and sedation scored on a five-point scale. Maternal and fetal cardiovascular variables were measured every 2 min for 20 min, at 30 min and subsequently at 15-min intervals. The reduction in VAS was greater at all times in the bupivacaine-clonidine group (P < 0.01). The median (range) duration of analgesia was greater in the bupivacaine-clonidine group (114.5 (30-243) min) compared with the bupivacaine group (53 (30-100) min) (P < 0.001). Analgesia was associated with a reduction in arterial pressure in both groups, but there were no between-group differences. Maternal heart rate was less than baseline values at 30-90 min in the bupivacaine-clonidine group only. Sedation was greater in the bupivacaine-clonidine group, especially from 15 to 45 min (P < 0.01). There were no differences in fetal heart rate, mode of delivery or Apgar scores between the two groups.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…