British journal of anaesthesia
-
Comment Letter Case Reports
Use of alfentanil and propofol for difficult tracheal intubation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Single-dose, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy cross-over comparison of extradural and i.v. clonidine in chronic pain.
We studied 10 patients with chronic back pain who had claimed benefit with a previous extradural dose of clonidine 150 micrograms combined with local anaesthetic. We compared a single dose of clonidine 150 micrograms given by either the extradural or i.v. route in a double-blind, randomized, double-dummy and cross-over fashion, with 80% power to detect a difference in the analgesic effect of the two routes. ⋯ Clonidine given by either route produced statistically significant sedation and significant decreases in arterial pressure and heart rate. In this study, extradural clonidine had no significant clinical advantages compared with i.v. clonidine; clonidine 150 micrograms by either route produced a high incidence of adverse effects.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of the analgesic effects of intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal morphine after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement.
We have studied the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total hip replacement under spinal anaesthesia. After routine spinal anaesthesia with 0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.75 ml, patients were allocated randomly to receive intrathecal clonidine, morphine or saline (control) as adjuvant to the bupivacaine. Postoperative analgesic effects were measured by consumption of morphine via patient-controlled analgesia and visual analogue pain scores. ⋯ Total morphine consumption on the first night after operation was significantly less in the intrathecal morphine group. There were no differences between the clonidine and the control group. Intrathecal clonidine prolonged the duration of spinal analgesia, but was markedly inferior to the intrathecal morphine in providing subsequent postoperative analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Effects of increasing doses of alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials.
We have studied dose-dependent effects of alfentanil, fentanyl and morphine on mid-latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP). Anaesthesia was induced with alfentanil 100 micrograms kg-1 every 5 min to a total dose of 500 micrograms kg-1 (group I, n = 10), fentanyl 10 micrograms kg-1 every 7 min to a total dose of 50 micrograms kg-1 (group II, n = 10) or morphine 1 mg kg-1 for induction and 0.5 mg kg-1 every 15 min to a total dose of 3 mg kg-1 (group III, n = 10). MLAEP were recorded before and 3-15 min after every opioid dose on vertex (positive) and mastoids on both sides (negative). ⋯ There was a marked increase only in latency and decrease in amplitude of P1. In contrast, for the early cortical potentials Na and Pa, only small increases in latencies and decreases in amplitudes were observed. After the largest doses of alfentanil (500 micrograms kg-1), fentanyl (50 micrograms kg-1) and morphine (3 mg kg-1), Na, Pa and Nb showed a similar pattern as in awake patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comment Letter Case Reports
Postdural puncture headache and extradural blood patch.