• Spine · Apr 2011

    Effect of number of fusion levels on S1 screws in long fusion construct in a calf spine model.

    • Rahul Chaudhari, Xiujun Zheng, Chunhui Wu, Amir A Mehbod, Ensor E Transfeldt, and Robert B Winter.
    • Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
    • Spine. 2011 Apr 15;36(8):624-9.

    Study DesignIn vitro biomechanical study evaluating the effect of fusion levels on simulated S1 screws on calf spines.ObjectiveTo measure the stresses of simulated S1 screws as a function of increasing fusion levels in long-fusion construct.Summary Of Background DataExtension of long fusion to sacrum remains a difficult clinical challenge despite the recent knowledge and technology. Several biomechanical studies have evaluated the bending moment on sacral screw of various fixation techniques. The high risk of sacral screw failure has been primarily attributed to the long lever arm of instrumentation and pullout force on S1 screw. However, none of these studies characterized how the number of fusion levels affected the sacral screw stresses. Because the number of fusion levels is an important factor in considering additional fixation options to protect the sacral screws, the effect of fusion levels on sacral screw stresses must be understood.MethodsEight calf spines (T13-L5) were used in this study (L5 is simulated as S1). Twelve pedicle screws were inserted. A combination of strain gages were attached to the spinal rods located between L4 and L5. Pure flexion moment (7.5 Nm) was applied to the partially fused construct as the level of fusion varied between 1 and 5 levels. The number of fusion levels increased from lower vertebrae to upper vertebrae. The pullout force, bending moment, and transverse force acting on the S1 screw were calculated from the strain gage signals. One way repeated measure ANOVA was used to analyze the pullout force, bending moment, and transverse force data.ResultsThe pullout force and transverse load had significant difference between single and multilevel fusion. However, no difference was found among multilevel fusion procedures (all P > 0.05). The mean pullout force was 29 ± 8 and mean transverse force was 139 ± 18 N. For bending moment, there was no statistical difference among all fusion levels. The average bending moment was 1.02 ± 0.34. Addition of anterior interbody cages at lower levels (L3-L4 and L4-L5) reduced the stresses on the simulated S1 screw by approximately 20% with P < 0.05.ConclusionAll three stresses, flexion moment, transverse load, and screw pullout force, must be considered in studying the biomechanics of long-fusion construct. There was no significant increase in sacral screw loading with increasing fusion levels when the same flexion moment was applied. It is postulated that the higher load present in long-fusion construct may lead to the premature failure of the lumbosacral fixation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.