• C M Samama.
• Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, CHU Hôtel-Dieu, 1 place du Parvis de Notre-Dame, 75181 Paris cedex 04, France. marc.samama@htd.aphp.fr
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008 Dec 1;27 Suppl 3:S2-8.

AbstractThe overall thromboembolic risk is the resultant of patient-related risk and surgical risk. The surgical risk is decreasing, especially with the introduction of new procedures (fast-track surgery). The value of prophylaxis has been firmly established. Mechanical prophylaxis is to be used as first-line prophylaxis when there is a risk of bleeding. Combining this with drugs increases the antithrombotic efficacy. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis on pulmonary embolism and mortality has not been demonstrated. Renal function needs to be evaluated when low molecular weight heparins, fondaparinux, rivaroxaban or dabigatran are prescribed. An age of over 75 years and low body weight (<50 kg) have to be taken into account. There is a risk of spinal or epidural hematoma in patients receiving anticoagulants. Caution should be taken especially when administering the newer agents. Patients undergoing surgery that involves a moderate or high overall risk should receive prophylaxis until full mobilization. Patients who have undergone a total hip replacement, surgery for hip fracture, or major abdominal surgery should receive prophylaxis for about 5 weeks longer. The relevance of distal vein thromboses is debated. Surrogate venographic end-points should be gradually replaced by a combination of ultrasound and clinical criteria. The new antithrombotic agents will probably modify prevention in the years to come but currently there are very few long-term data for these products for which - it should be reminded - no antagonists are available.

48 keywords...

hide…