-
- Chang-Bae Kong, Do-Whan Jeon, Bong-Soon Chang, Jae Hyup Lee, Kyung-Soo Suk, and Jong-Beom Park.
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Spine. 2010 Jul 1;35(15):1489-94.
Study DesignRetrospective cross-sectional study.ObjectiveTo evaluate the degree of postoperative pain and patients' satisfaction after lumbar fusion from a nationwide survey in Korea.Summary Of Background DataThere have been few studies that investigated the factors related to patients' satisfaction after spinal fusion in lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).MethodsThis study included 629 patients who underwent spinal fusion for LDD at clinics of designated members of the Korean Society of Spine Surgery. This survey was done in 123 hospitals with 171 spine surgeons. Questionnaires for patients included severity of present back pain and radicular pain (visual analog scale score), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and subjective outcomes. Questionnaire for surgeons included preoperative diagnosis, level of fusion, operative method, and presumed patient's pain.ResultsThe patients were 199 men and 430 women, with mean age of 62.3 years. The mean visual analog scale score of back pain and radicular pain was 5.0 +/- 2.6 and 4.4 +/- 3.0, respectively. The mean ODI was 44.3 +/- 19.4. ODI was significantly increased with older age, workers' compensation, and increased fusion extent. Correlated factors of dissatisfaction were severe back pain, higher ODI, multiple operation, and insufficient explanation about postoperative pain. There was a significant correlation between preoperative explanation about postoperative pain and degree of patient's pain.ConclusionPatients' satisfaction was not as high as expected after fusion for LDD. Therefore, the decision for performing a lumbar fusion in those patients must be done more carefully, and it should be explained more precisely that chronic pain may persist after spinal surgery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.