• Spine · Oct 2016

    Utility of the LevelCheck Algorithm for Decision Support in Vertebral Localization.

    • Tharindu De Silva, LoSheng-Fu LSLDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland., Nafi Aygun, Daniel M Aghion, Akwasi Boah, Rory Petteys, Ali Uneri, Michael D Ketcha, Thomas Yi, Sebastian Vogt, Gerhard Kleinszig, Wei Wei, Markus Weiten, Xiaobu Ye, Ali Bydon, Daniel M Sciubba, Timothy F Witham, Jean-Paul Wolinsky, and Jeffrey H Siewerdsen.
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
    • Spine. 2016 Oct 15; 41 (20): E1249-E1256.

    Study DesignAn automatic radiographic labeling algorithm called "LevelCheck" was analyzed as a means of decision support for target localization in spine surgery. The potential clinical utility and scenarios in which LevelCheck is likely to be the most beneficial were assessed in a retrospective clinical data set (398 cases) in terms of expert consensus from a multi-reader study (three spine surgeons).ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the potential utility of the LevelCheck algorithm for vertebrae localization.Summary Of Background DataThree hundred ninety-eight intraoperative radiographs and 178 preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images for patients undergoing spine surgery in cervical, thoracic, lumbar regions.MethodsVertebral labels annotated in preoperative CT image were overlaid on intraoperative radiographs via 3D-2D registration. Three spine surgeons assessed the radiographs and LevelCheck labeling according to a questionnaire evaluating performance, utility, and suitability to surgical workflow. Geometric accuracy and registration run time were measured for each case.ResultsLevelCheck was judged to be helpful in 42.2% of the cases (168/398), to improve confidence in 30.6% of the cases (122/398), and in no case diminished performance (0/398), supporting its potential as an independent check and assistant to decision support in spine surgery. The clinical contexts for which the method was judged most likely to be beneficial included the following scenarios: images with a lack of conspicuous anatomical landmarks; level counting across long spine segments; vertebrae obscured by other anatomy (e.g., shoulders); poor radiographic image quality; and anatomical variations/abnormalities. The method demonstrated 100% geometric accuracy (i.e., overlaid labels within the correct vertebral level in all cases) and did not introduce ambiguity in image interpretation.ConclusionLevelCheck is a potentially useful means of decision support in vertebral level localization in spine surgery.Level Of EvidenceN/A.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.