• Anesthesiology · Nov 2014

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study

    Epidural Steroid Injections, Conservative Treatment, or Combination Treatment for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-effectiveness Study.

    • Steven P Cohen, Salim Hayek, Yevgeny Semenov, Paul F Pasquina, Ronald L White, Elias Veizi, Julie H Y Huang, Connie Kurihara, Zirong Zhao, Kevin B Guthmiller, Scott R Griffith, Aubrey V Verdun, David M Giampetro, and Yakov Vorobeychik.
    • From the Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (S.P.C.); Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio (S.H.); Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (Y.S.); Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (P.F.P.); Pain Treatment Center, Department of Surgery, Regional Medical Center, Landstuhl, Germany (R.L.W.); Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Department of Anesthesiology, Case Western University, Cleveland, Ohio (E.V.); Department of Anesthesiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical University, New York, New York (J.H.Y.H.); Anesthesia Service, Department of Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland (C.K., S.R.G., A.V.V.); Departments of Internal Medicine and Neurology, District of Columbia VA Hospital, Washington, D.C. (Z.Z.); Pain Treatment Center, Department of Anesthesiology, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas (K.B.G.); Department of Anesthesiology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland (S.R.G., A.V.V.); and Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania (D.M.G., Y.V.).
    • Anesthesiology. 2014 Nov 1;121(5):1045-55.

    BackgroundCervical radicular pain is a major cause of disability. No studies have been published comparing different types of nonsurgical therapy.MethodsA comparative-effectiveness study was performed in 169 patients with cervical radicular pain less than 4 yr in duration. Participants received nortriptyline and/or gabapentin plus physical therapies, up to three cervical epidural steroid injections (ESI) or combination treatment over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was average arm pain on a 0 to 10 scale at 1 month.ResultsOne-month arm pain scores were 3.5 (95% CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in the combination group, 4.2 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in ESI patients, and 4.3 (CI, 2.8 to 4.2) in individuals treated conservatively (P = 0.26). Combination group patients experienced a mean reduction of -3.1 (95% CI, -3.8 to -2.3) in average arm pain at 1 month versus -1.8 (CI, -2.5 to -1.2) in the conservative group and -2.0 (CI, -2.7 to -1.3) in ESI patients (P = 0.035). For neck pain, a mean reduction of -2.2 (95% CI, -3.0 to -1.5) was noted in combination patients versus -1.2 (CI, -1.9 to -0.5) in conservative group patients and -1.1 (CI, -1.8 to -0.4) in those who received ESI; P = 0.064). Three-month posttreatment, 56.9% of patients treated with combination therapy experienced a positive outcome versus 26.8% in the conservative group and 36.7% in ESI patients (P = 0.006).ConclusionsFor the primary outcome measure, no significant differences were found between treatments, although combination therapy provided better improvement than stand-alone treatment on some measures. Whereas these results suggest an interdisciplinary approach to neck pain may improve outcomes, confirmatory studies are needed.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…