• Jiyoung Jang, Jihyang Lim, Kiyuk Chang, Yonggoo Kim, Myungshin Kim, Hae Il Park, Jayoung Kim, and Soyoung Shin.
• Department of Laboratory Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
• J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2012 Jul 1;26(4):262-6.

IntroductionVerifyNow P2Y12 is commonly used to measure responsiveness to clopidogrel. We sought to compare the results obtained from novel INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay to assess the clopidogrel resistance in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.MethodsA total of 255 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, preliminarily treated with 100 mg/day of aspirin followed by coadministration of clopidogrel (loading dose, 600 mg; maintenance dose, 75 mg/day), were enrolled in this study. Platelet aggregation was measured by INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12.ResultsINNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow P2Y12 assay showed moderate correlations with INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y vs. VerifyNow%inhibition: r = 0.412, P < 0.0001; INNOVANCE® PFA P2Yvs.VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRU): r = -0.402, P < 0.0001. The agreement between INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow%inhibition was 85% and that of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow PRU was 79%. The k statistics between INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y and VerifyNow%inhibition and PRU were 0.52 and 0.44, respectively.ConclusionsThe sensitivity of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y in detecting clopidogrel resistance is comparable to that of VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. As the PFA-100® system is already widely used, the new test cartilage may be a useful tool for the assessment of clopidogrel effects. Additional clinical correlation studies are required to validate the effectiveness of INNOVANCE® PFA P2Y in predicting long-term clinical outcomes.© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

29 keywords...

hide…