• Mohammad I El-Orbany, Yohannes B Getachew, Ninos J Joseph, M Ramez Salem, and Michael Friedman.
• Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wis,. Electronic address: elorbany@mcw.edu.
• J Clin Anesth. 2015 Mar 1;27(2):153-8.

Study ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of changing head position on the laryngeal view in the same subject.DesignProspective, randomized, crossover comparison of laryngeal views.SettingOperating suite at a university-affiliated, community hospital.PatientsOne hundred sixty-seven consenting adult patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery with general anesthesia.InterventionsAfter anesthesia induction and muscle relaxation and the head in extended position, the laryngeal view was graded in 3 different head height positions. A special inflatable pillow was placed under the subject's head before induction and was deflated to produce no head elevation or inflated to produce either 6.0cm (sniffing position), or 10.0cm elevation (elevated sniffing position) in random order.Main ResultsThe incidence of difficult laryngoscopy (grade ≥3) was 8.38% with no head elevation, 2.39% in the sniffing position, and 1.19% in the elevated sniffing position. Head elevation was not associated with a worse grade in any single patient.ConclusionsSniffing position improves glottic exposure when the laryngoscopic grade is greater than 1 in the head-flat position. The elevated sniffing position improves the view to a better grade in some patients. Because head elevation was not associated with a worse grade in any subject, the elevated sniffing position should be considered as the initial head position before direct laryngoscopy when a difficult exposure is anticipated.Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…