• M Bahar, M L Cohen, Y Grinshpon, and M Chanimov.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Assaf Harofeh, Medical Centre, Zerifin, Israel.
• Can J Anaesth. 1997 Feb 1; 44 (2): 208-15.

PurposeThis study examined in an animal model whether intrathecal midazolam, alone or with fentanyl, can achieve anaesthesia sufficient for laparotomy, comparable to lidocaine. Effects on consciousness and whether anaesthesia was segmental were also examined. The haemodynamic and respiratory changes were compared with those of intrathecal lidocaine or intrathecal fentanyl alone.MethodsSixty Wistar strain rats, with nylon catheters chronically implanted in the lumbar subarachnoid theca, were divided into six groups. Group 1 (n = 12) received 75 microL intrathecal lidocaine 2%. Group 2 (n = 12) received 75 microL intrathecal midazolam 0.1%, Group 3 (n = 12) received intrathecal 37.5 microL midazolam 0.1%, plus 37.5 microL fentanyl 0.005%. Group 4 (n = 12) received intrathecal 50 microL fentanyl 0.005%. Group 5 (n = 6) received 75 microL midazolam 0.1% iv. Group 6 (n = 6) received halothane 0.6% in oxygen by inhalation.ResultsBoth groups that received intrathecal midazolam, alone or combined with fentanyl, developed effective segmental sensory and motor blockade of the hind limbs and abdominal wall, sufficient for a pain-free laparotomy procedure. Neither of these groups, unlike the group that received intrathecal lidocaine, developed a reduction in blood pressure or change in heart rate at the time of maximal sensory or motor blockade, nor were there changes in the arterial blood gases or respiratory rate.ConclusionMidazolam, when injected intrathecally, produces reversible, segmental, spinally mediated antinociception, sufficient to provide balanced anaesthesia for abdominal surgery.

19 keywords...

hide…