This follow-up paper to the original COMET study describes in detail the high and low-dose epidural techniques and the subsequent anesthetic characteristics.

The low-dose techniques used infusions of 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 mcg/mL fentanyl, compared with 10mL boluses of 0.25% bupivacaine. Maternal analgesia experience was similar between the groups, all the CSE group experienced better analgesia in the first hour.

summary

• Matthew J A Wilson, Griselda Cooper, Christine MacArthur, Andrew Shennan, and Comparative Obstetric Mobile Epidural Trial (COMET) Study Group UK.
• Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. matt_ja_wilson@hotmail.com
• Anesthesiology. 2002 Dec 1;97(6):1567-75.

BackgroundThe authors recently showed that "mobile" epidural analgesia, using low-dose local anesthetic-opioid mixtures, reduces the impact of epidural analgesia on instrumental vaginal delivery, relative to a traditional technique. The main prespecified assessment of pain relief efficacy, women's postpartum estimates of labor pain after epidural insertion, did not differ. The detailed analgesic efficacy and the anesthetic characteristics of the techniques are reported here.MethodsA total of 1,054 nulliparous women were randomized, in labor, to receive boluses of 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (traditional), combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia, or low-dose infusion (LDI), the latter groups utilizing 0.1% bupivacaine with 2 microg/ml fentanyl. Visual analog scale pain assessments were collected throughout labor and delivery and 24 h later. Details of the conduct of epidural analgesia, drug utilization, and requirement for anesthesiologist reattendance were recorded.ResultsA total of 353 women were randomized to receive traditional epidural analgesia, 351 received CSE, and 350 received LDI. CSE was associated with a more rapid onset of analgesia, lower median visual analog scale pain scores than traditional in the first hour after epidural insertion, and a significant reduction in bupivacaine dose given during labor. Pain scores reported by women receiving LDI were similar to those in the traditional group throughout labor and delivery. Anesthesiologist reattendance was low but greater with each mobile technique.ConclusionsRelative to traditional epidural analgesia, LDI is at least as effective and CSE provided better pain relief in the early stages after insertion. The proven efficacy of mobile epidurals and their beneficial impact on delivery mode make them the preferred techniques for epidural pain relief in labor.

This article appears in the collections: Landmark obstetric anesthesia papers and Landmark articles in Anesthesia.

12 keywords...

hide…