• Martinus Bråten, Per Helland, Torbjørn Grøntvedt, Arild Aamodt, Pål Benum, and Anders Mølster.
• Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital, 7006, Trondheim, Norway. martinus.braten@medisin.ntnu.no
• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005 Feb 1; 125 (1): 21-6.

IntroductionWe performed a prospective, randomised study to compare the Ex-fi-re external fixator (EF) with locked intramedullary (IM) nailing in tibial fractures. Only fractures without soft-tissue problems of importance were included.Materials And MethodsEx-fi-re is a unilateral, dynamic axial fixator with fracture reduction capabilities. The Grosse-Kempf nail was used for nailing. A total of 78 patients with 79 fractures were entered in the study (41 Ex-fi-re, 38 IM nails).ResultsTime to radiographic union and full weight-bearing did not differ significantly, but unprotected weight-bearing was achieved earlier in the IM group (12 vs 20 weeks; p<0.001). There were more reoperations due to secondary dislocation in the EF group. There were no differences in final angulation or shortening. After 6 months and 1 year there were no differences in knee motion, ankle motion, fracture site pain or ankle pain. Some 64% of the nailed patients complained of anterior knee pain after 1 year.ConclusionThe results were comparable in most respects. Unprotected weight-bearing was achieved earlier after IM nailing. Anterior knee pain was frequent after nailing.

24 keywords...

hide…