• Pierre A Fortier.
• Dept. Cell. Mol. Medicine, Univ. Ottawa, Ottawa K1H 8M5, Canada. Electronic address: pfortier@uottawa.ca.
• Neuroscience. 2017 Apr 21; 348: 41-62.

AbstractThe simple cells of the visual cortex respond over a narrow range of stimulus orientations, and this tuning is invariant to the contrast at which the stimulus is presented. The inputs to a single cell derive from a population of thalamic cells that provide a bell-shaped tuning width and offset that increases with stimulus contrast. Synaptic depression, noise and inhibition have been proposed as feedforward mechanisms to explain why these increases do not appear in simple cells. The extent to which these three mechanisms contribute to contrast-invariant orientation tuning is unknown. Consequently, the aim was to test the hypothesis that these mechanisms do not contribute equally. Unlike previous studies, all mechanisms were examined using the same network model based on Banitt et al. (2007). The results showed that thalamocortical synaptic noise was essential and sufficient to widen tuning widths at low contrasts to that of higher contrasts but could not counteract the offset at higher contrasts. Thalamocortical synaptic depression could only be used to counteract a small fraction of the offset otherwise the relationship between contrast and response rate was disrupted. Only broadly tuned simple and complex cell inhibition could counteract the remaining offset for all stimulus contrasts but complex cell inhibition reduced the gain of the response. These results suggest unequal contributions of these feedforward mechanisms with thalamic synaptic noise widening tuning widths for low contrasts, synaptic depression counteracting a small component of the offset and synaptic inhibition completely removing the remaining offset to produce contrast-invariant orientation tuning.Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

2 keywords...

hide…