• Holly L Spraker-Perlman, Reena P Tam, Tyler Bardsley, Jacob Wilkes, Leah Farley, Dominic Moore, Joan Sheetz, and Justin N Baker.
• 1 Division of Quality of Life and Palliative Care, Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
• J Palliat Med. 2019 May 1; 22 (5): 553-556.

Abstract Background: The impact of pediatric palliative care (PPC) is well established for children with chronic complex diseases. However, PPC likely also benefits previously healthy children with acute life-threatening conditions. Objective: To determine the incidence and impact of PPC for previously healthy patients who died in a pediatric hospital. Design: Retrospective chart review of all pediatric deaths over four years. Setting/Subjects: Patients were 0 to 25 years old, died during an inpatient stay at an academic pediatric hospital ≥48 hours after admission, and had no complex chronic conditions (CCCs) before admission. Measurements: One hundred sixty-seven patients met the eligibility criteria. Most died in intensive care settings (n = 149, 89%), and few (n = 34, 20%) received PPC consultations or services. Results: Patients who received PPC services were more likely to receive a multidisciplinary care conference than did patients without PPC support (70.5% vs. 39.9%; p = 0.001), which also occurred earlier for patients who received PPC services (seven days vs. two days before death; p = 0.04). Most patients had documented end-of-life planning in their medical records; however, this occurred earlier for patients who received PPC consultation (9.5 days before death) than for those who did not (two days before death; p < 0.0001). Patients receiving PPC support (67.7%) were also more likely to have a do-not-resuscitate/intubate order before death than those who did not (39.9%; p = 0.004). Conclusions: Pediatric patients without known CCCs who subsequently die as inpatients benefit from PPC in terms of goals of care discussions and documentation of end-of-life care preferences.

29 keywords...

hide…