• Julia Friedrich and Christian Beste.
• Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden. Electronic address: julia.friedrich@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
• Neuroscience. 2019 Jul 1; 410: 191-201.

AbstractResponse inhibition is a central aspect of cognitive control. Usually, response inhibition is examined using information from a single sensory modality. Yet, evidence suggests that conflicts between information from different modalities affect response inhibition. It is, however, crucial to consider that there are modality differences in the efficiency to trigger response inhibition that may also modulate the impact of conflicts between different sensory modalities. In the current study, we compared an auditory-tactile to an auditory-visual Go/NO-GO task. We recorded EEG data and performed signal decomposition and source localization. On the behavioral level, we show stronger interference effects in the visual than the tactile modality. Despite sensory processes were experimentally varied, temporally decomposed EEG data show that response selection mechanisms are associated with these effects and not the sensory processing stage. These modulations of response selection processes occur in the temporo-parietal junction (TPJ, BA40) and inferior frontal structures (IFG, BA47). The smaller activity in the TPJ during auditory-tactile, compared to auditory-visual conflicts suggests that task representations are less affected by interfering auditory information when the tactile modality informs response inhibition processes. This also explains why less intense braking processes (reflected by IFG activity) are still able to maintain a reasonable response inhibition performance level. It can be concluded that the tactile and visual domains do not only differ in regard to their efficiency to trigger response inhibition processes but also in their susceptibility to interference while informing inhibitory control. Clinical implications are discussed.Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

32 keywords...

hide…