• Nida Faheem, Domenico A Gattozzi, Ernest J Madarang, Paul J Camarata, and Gary S Gronseth.
• Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct 1; 130: e831-e838.

ObjectiveTo determine whether cranial metrics consistently differed between patients with moyamoya and age-, sex-, and race-matched controls.MethodsPatients diagnosed with moyamoya disease by cerebral angiogram were obtained from a prospectively collected database through the Department of Neurosurgery at the University of Kansas Medical Center. Control patients matched by decade of age, sex, and race were collected through a deidentified hospital database by International Classification of Diseases-9 and 10 codes for ischemic stroke to identify patients with computed tomography angiograms. Imaging studies for both groups were analyzed to obtain 6 skull metrics: maximum anterior to posterior distance, maximum biparietal distance, bregma to occiput distance, right carotid canal diameter (CCD), left CCD, and cephalic index.ResultsForty-five patients were identified in each cohort. Measurements of mean anterior to posterior skull diameter, mean biparietal skull diameter, bregma to occiput distances, and calculated cephalic index did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between patients with moyamoya and control patients. Right carotid canal mean diameter was 4.8 mm for the moyamoya group and 5.4 mm for the control group, with a significant raw mean difference of -0.61 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.95 to -0.27). Left CCD was 4.7 mm for the moyamoya group and 5.5 mm for the control group, resulting in a significant raw mean difference of -0.76 mm (95% confidence interval, -1.09 to -0.43).ConclusionsThis study identified 2 skull parameters as statistically different in patients with moyamoya compared with a matched control group of patients with ischemic stroke: right CCD and left CCD.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…