• Brian C Healy, Ashish Arora, Douglas L Hayden, Antonia Ceccarelli, Shahamat S Tauhid, Mohit Neema, and Rohit Bakshi.
• Department of Neurology, Partners Multiple Sclerosis Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA. bchealy@partners.org
• J Neuroimaging. 2012 Jul 1;22(3):e12-9.

Background And PurposeTo determine the proper method for the normalization of spinal cord volume.Materials And MethodsA group of 34 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients (28 relapsing and 6 progressive) and 15 healthy controls had whole spinal cord 3-mm thick T2-weighted axial fast spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images obtained at 3T. For each participant, four volumes were measured (C2-3 volume, cervical cord volume, thoracic cord volume, and whole cord volume). The volumes were normalized by the number of slices and three potential measures of body size (intracranial volume [ICV], body mass index, and body surface area) using the proportional method.ResultsAll raw volumes and volumes normalized by number of slices or ICV were significantly lower in progressive MS patients compared to relapsing MS patients/healthy controls (P < .05). In addition, C2-3 volume and cervical cord volume were significantly correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .05). All regional volumes showed high intercorrelation, and normalization by the number of slices significantly increased some correlations. Regarding reliability, whole cord volume regardless of normalization technique had lower coefficient of variation than C2-3 volume.ConclusionsSince normalization factor had limited impact on reliability and the ability to detect differences, normalization by the number of slices is recommended.© 2011 by the American Society of Neuroimaging.

28 keywords...

hide…