-
- Rebecca Anhang Price, Brian Stucky, Layla Parast, Marc N Elliott, Ann Haas, Melissa Bradley, and Joan M Teno.
- 1 RAND Corporation , Arlington, Virginia.
- J Palliat Med. 2018 Jul 1; 21 (7): 924-932.
BackgroundIncreasingly, dying patients and their families have a choice of hospice providers. Care quality varies considerably across providers; informing consumers of these differences may help to improve their selection of hospices.ObjectiveTo develop and evaluate standardized survey measures of hospice care experiences for the purpose of comparing and publicly reporting hospice performance.DesignWe assessed item performance and constructed composite measures by factor analysis, evaluating item-scale correlations and estimating reliability. To assess key drivers of overall experiences, we regressed overall rating and willingness to recommend the hospice on each composite.Setting/SubjectsData submitted by 2500 hospices participating in national implementation of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Hospice Survey for April through September 2015.MeasurementsComposite measures of Hospice Team Communication, Getting Timely Care, Treating Family Member with Respect, Getting Emotional and Religious Support, Getting Help for Symptoms, and Getting Hospice Care Training.ResultsCronbach's alpha estimates for the composite measures range from 0.61 to 0.85; hospice-level reliability for the measures range from 0.67 to 0.81 assuming 200 completed surveys per hospice. Together, the composites are responsible for 48% of the variance in caregivers' overall ratings of hospices. Hospice Team Communication is the strongest predictor of overall rating of care.ConclusionOur analyses provide evidence of the reliability and validity of CAHPS Hospice Survey measure scores. Results also highlight important opportunities to improve the quality of hospice care, particularly with regard to addressing symptoms of anxiety and sadness, discussing side effects of pain medicine, and keeping family informed of the patient's condition.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:

- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.