• Jordan Blinder, Mervat El-Mansouri, and Neil Roy Connelly.
• Baystate Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA 01199, USA.
• J Anesth. 2003 Jan 1; 17 (1): 8-12.

PurposeThere is a wide range of anesthetic practice in spine surgery with respect to anesthetic choice, blood conservation, and monitoring. There is no ideal technique with respect to each of these choices. This study was designed to determine the usual practice for members of the Society of Neurosurgical Anesthesia and Critical Care (SNACC), with regard to the use of anesthetic technique, the type of monitoring used (and the person responsible for its application and interpretation), and the blood conservation strategies most often utilized for the management of patients undergoing spinal surgery.MethodsA total of 415 questionnaires were mailed to all current members of the SNACC. Of these, 85 (23%) were completed and returned.ResultsThe majority of the respondents administer general anesthesia for lumbar laminectomy. Somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) monitoring is available at most of the institutions (94%) but only utilized in 75% of patients undergoing a Harrington rod placement. Motor evoked potential monitoring is available at 50% of the institutions, but utilized 25% of the time for these surgeries. The two most frequent blood conservation strategies utilized are intraoperative salvage and autologous donation.ConclusionThe most frequent monitoring utilized for major spinal surgeries is SSEP. Autologous donation and intraoperative salvage are the most frequent blood conservation methods utilized.

18 keywords...

hide…