• Injury · Feb 2020

    3D printed navigation template-guided minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for distal femoral fracture: A retrospective cohort study.

    • Lukun Sun, Hua Liu, Chuntao Xu, Bingxiang Yan, Hanyu Yue, and Pingshan Wang.
    • PLA 960 Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
    • Injury. 2020 Feb 1; 51 (2): 436-442.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate functional and radiological outcomes in distal femoral fracture patients (distal femoral shaft fractures or metaphyseal fractures) receiving indirect reduction and internal fixation with the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPPO) assisted by 3D printing navigation templates.MethodsThis retrospective study included all adult (≥18 years) patients who underwent MIPPO for distal femoral fracture (AO32/33) at PLA 960 Hospital, Jinan, China between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016. 3D printed navigation templates were used to assist surgery. Functional assessment was performed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Functional Knee Society Score (FKSS). Postoperative deformity was assessed with 3D-CT reconstruction using contralateral (non-fracture) side as the reference.ResultsA total of 54 patients underwent MIPPO for distal femoral fracture during the review period (34 and 20 for conventional and template-guided MIPPO, respectively). At 10-14 months, the KSS score was 160.6 ± 18.1 and 167.5 ± 17.2 in the conventional and template-guided MIPPO groups, respectively (p = 0.18). The FKSS was 77.6 ± 9.4 in the conventional MIPPO group vs. 81.0 ± 8.5 in the template-guided MIPPO group (p = 0.15). Femoral length difference was smaller in template-guided MIPPO group (3.31 ± 1.53 vs. 9.50 ± 4.49 mm in the control; p < 0.01). Template-guided MIPPO group also had smaller anatomic lateral distal femoral angle (aLDFA) difference (1.57° ± 0.72° vs. 3.89° ± 1.72° in the control; p < 0.01), anatomic posterior distal femoral angle (aPDFA) difference (1.95° ± 0.78° vs. 5.04° ± 1.78°; p < 0.01), and anteversion angle difference (2.52° ± 1.00° vs. 8.23° ± 4.07°; p < 0.01). The rate of length discrepancy (>20 mm), coronal angulation deformity (aLDFA difference >5°), sagittal angulation deformity (aPDFA difference >10°), and rotational malalignment (anteversion angle >10°) was 5.9%, 20.5%, 2.9%, and 32.4% in the control group. No patients in the template-guided MIPPO group had deformity of any type.ConclusionsMIPPO assisted by 3D printing navigation templates could practically improve surgical accuracy and eliminate postoperative rotational deformity in patients with distal femoral fractures.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.