• BMJ · Jan 2013

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Long term effect of depression care management on mortality in older adults: follow-up of cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care.

    • Joseph J Gallo, Knashawn H Morales, Hillary R Bogner, Patrick J Raue, Jarcy Zee, Martha L Bruce, and Charles F Reynolds.
    • Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
    • BMJ. 2013 Jan 1;346:f2570.

    ObjectiveTo investigate whether an intervention to improve treatment of depression in older adults in primary care modified the increased risk of death associated with depression.DesignLong term follow-up of multi-site practice randomized controlled trial (PROSPECT-Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial).Setting20 primary care practices in New York City, Philadelphia, and Pittsburgh, USA, randomized to intervention or usual care.Participants1226 participants identified between May 1999 and August 2001 through a two stage, age stratified (60-74; ≥ 75 years) depression screening of randomly sampled patients; enrollment included patients who screened positive and a random sample of patients who screened negative.InterventionFor two years, a depression care manager worked with primary care physicians in intervention practices to provide algorithm based care for depression, offering psychotherapy, increasing antidepressant dose if indicated, and monitoring symptoms, adverse effects of drugs, and adherence to treatment. This paper reports the long term follow-up.Main Outcome MeasureMortality risk based on a median follow-up of 98 (range 0.8-116.4) months through 2008.ResultsIn baseline clinical interviews, 396 people were classified as having major depression, 203 had clinically significant minor depression, and 627 did not meet criteria for depression. At follow-up, 405 patients had died. Patients with major depression in usual care were more likely to die than were those without depression (hazard ratio 1.90, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 2.31). In contrast, patients with major depression in intervention practices were at no greater risk than were people without depression (hazard ratio 1.09, 0.83 to 1.44). Patients with major depression in intervention practices, relative to usual care, were 24% less likely to have died (hazard ratio 0.76, 0.57 to 1.00; P=0.05). Preliminary data on cause of death are provided. No significant effect on mortality was found for minor depression.ConclusionsOlder adults with major depression in practices provided with additional resources to intensively manage depression had a mortality risk lower than that observed in usual care and similar to older adults without depression.Trial RegistrationClinical trials NCT00000367.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,642 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.