• J Palliat Med · Jul 2015

    Evaluating Stakeholder-Identified Barriers in Accessing Palliative Care at an NCI-Designated Cancer Center with a Rural Catchment Area.

    • Jessica Keim-Malpass, Emma M Mitchell, Leslie Blackhall, and Pam B DeGuzman.
    • 1 School of Nursing, Division of Palliative Care, University of Virginia , Charlottesville, Virginia.
    • J Palliat Med. 2015 Jul 1;18(7):634-7.

    BackgroundThe new Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation standards encompass palliative care (PC) and a patient-centered approach, including specific quality measurements and outcomes. However, cancer centers differ in their interpretation of the CoC standards for PC in level of integration in the care trajectory and services provided.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to identify existing barriers in accessing PC services for cancer patients at a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-designated academic cancer center with a rural catchment area, using the CoC guidelines as a point of reference.MethodsThis study utilized a cross-sectional qualitative design and conventional content analysis. Subjects were faculty/staff from the cancer center or from community affiliates located outside the main campus. Measurement was by semistructured qualitative interviews. Forty-two interviews were included in the final sample: clinicians, administrative support staff, and service support personnel.ResultsFour themes were developed from the analysis focusing on barriers to PC integration: (1) fragmentation of services, (2) unclear pathways and triggers for referral, (3) demand exceeds available practitioners, and (4) insufficient or inadequate education for patients and oncology providers.ConclusionsThis study highlights aspects of integration of PC that can be enhanced from a process, education, and systems perspective with a particular focus on the care coordination of a rural cancer population.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,706,642 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.