Injury
-
Review
A scientometric analysis of bone cutting tools & methodologies: Mapping the research landscape.
This study undertakes a Scientometric analysis of bone-cutting tools, investigating a corpus of 735 papers from the Scopus database between 1941 and 2023. It employs bibliometric methodologies such as keyword coupling, co-citation, and co-authorship analysis to map the intellectual landscape and collaborative networks within this research domain. The analysis highlights a growing interest and significant advancements in bone-cutting tools, focusing on their design, the materials used, and the cutting processes involved. ⋯ Further, the study reveals a broad collaboration among researchers from various disciplines, including engineering, materials science, and medical sciences, reflecting the field's interdisciplinary nature. Despite the progress, the analysis points out several gaps, notably in tool design optimization and the impact of materials on bone health. This comprehensive review not only charts the evolution of bone-cutting tool research but also calls attention to areas requiring further investigation, aiming to inspire future studies that address these identified gaps and enhance surgical outcomes.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Utility of severity scoring systems for mangled upper limb salvage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The purpose of scoring systems is to aid in the decision-making process of whether to salvage or amputate mangled extremities, but their efficacy for upper limbs is uncertain. In this study, we examined the predictive potential of scoring systems for upper limb salvage. ⋯ The pooled sensitivity and specificity for MESS were comparable to those reported for the lower extremities. The specificity suggests that limb salvage was achieved in at least 20 % of the patients whose MESS was above the threshold beyond which amputation is indicated. Given the likelihood of upper extremity functional limitations following amputation and the drawbacks of prostheses, we conclude that current scoring systems poorly predict salvageability of a mangled upper extremity and should not be used to justify amputation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Utility of severity scoring systems for mangled upper limb salvage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
The purpose of scoring systems is to aid in the decision-making process of whether to salvage or amputate mangled extremities, but their efficacy for upper limbs is uncertain. In this study, we examined the predictive potential of scoring systems for upper limb salvage. ⋯ The pooled sensitivity and specificity for MESS were comparable to those reported for the lower extremities. The specificity suggests that limb salvage was achieved in at least 20 % of the patients whose MESS was above the threshold beyond which amputation is indicated. Given the likelihood of upper extremity functional limitations following amputation and the drawbacks of prostheses, we conclude that current scoring systems poorly predict salvageability of a mangled upper extremity and should not be used to justify amputation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Antiplatelets versus anticoagulants in the treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in 1-3% of blunt traumas and is associated with stroke, disability, and mortality if unrecognized and untreated. Early detection and treatment are imperative to reduce the risk of stroke, however, there is significant variation amongst centers and trauma care providers in the specific medical management strategy used. This study compares antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants to determine BCVI-related stroke risk and bleeding complications to better understand the efficacy and safety of various treatment strategies. ⋯ Treatment of patients with BCVI with antiplatelets is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding complications compared to treatment with anticoagulants. Use of ASA vs. heparin specifically was not associated with differences in stroke risk, however, patients treated with ASA had fewer bleeding complications. Based on this evidence, antiplatelets should be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with BCVI.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Antiplatelets versus anticoagulants in the treatment of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in 1-3% of blunt traumas and is associated with stroke, disability, and mortality if unrecognized and untreated. Early detection and treatment are imperative to reduce the risk of stroke, however, there is significant variation amongst centers and trauma care providers in the specific medical management strategy used. This study compares antiplatelets vs. anticoagulants to determine BCVI-related stroke risk and bleeding complications to better understand the efficacy and safety of various treatment strategies. ⋯ Treatment of patients with BCVI with antiplatelets is associated with lower risks of stroke and bleeding complications compared to treatment with anticoagulants. Use of ASA vs. heparin specifically was not associated with differences in stroke risk, however, patients treated with ASA had fewer bleeding complications. Based on this evidence, antiplatelets should be the preferred treatment strategy for patients with BCVI.