Journal of neuroscience methods
-
J. Neurosci. Methods · Dec 2015
Randomized Controlled TrialDemarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones: Punctate stimulation pressure matters.
Secondary hyperalgesia is increased sensitivity in normal tissue near an injury, and it is a measure of central sensitization reflecting injury-related effects on the CNS. Secondary hyperalgesia areas (SHAs), usually assessed by polyamide monofilaments, are important outcomes in studies of analgesic drug effects in humans. However, since the methods applied in demarcating the secondary hyperalgesia zone seem inconsistent across studies, we examined the effect of a standardized approach upon the measurement of SHA following a first degree burn injury (BI). ⋯ This is the first study to demonstrate that demarcation of secondary hyperalgesia zones depends on the developed pressure of the punctate stimulator used.
-
J. Neurosci. Methods · Jan 2015
Randomized Controlled TrialMethodology for studying the transient effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with auditory residual inhibition on tinnitus.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and auditory residual inhibition (RI) are short lasting non-invasive techniques that can suppress tinnitus in some people. A pilot study was undertaken to evaluate methods to measure a potential additive effect of these treatments. ⋯ We propose modifications in the protocol used, to find ways to increase the duration of auditory RI and investigate its underlying mechanisms. Recommendations for further research are discussed.
-
J. Neurosci. Methods · Sep 2007
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA comparative study of the effects of repetitive paired transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor cortical excitability.
Various methods of application of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have been evaluated for their potential capacity to alter motor cortical excitability. Initial research suggests that the repetitive application of paired TMS pulses (repetitive paired pulse TMS (rppTMS)) may have greater effects on cortical excitability, perhaps through the facilitation of I-wave interaction. We aimed to compare the post-train effects of 15 min trains of rppTMS to investigate the potential therapeutic application of this technique as well as to compare it to a standard high frequency repetitive TMS paradigm. ⋯ Fifteen minutes trains of 1.5ms rppTMS do not substantially increase post train cortical excitability. Repetitive brief trains of 5Hz rTMS also do not alter excitability but appear to effect cortical inhibition.