The American journal of emergency medicine
-
To determine the clinical usefulness of infrared skin temperatures in diagnosing appendicitis, the authors conducted a prospective study of 86 adult and pediatric emergency department (ED) patients presenting during a 4-month study period with acute right lower abdominal pain. Skin temperature readings (FirstTemp digital thermometer, Intelligent Medical Systems, Inc, Carlsbad, CA) were taken from the right lower abdominal quadrant and a corresponding position on the left. An unpaired t test was used to determine if there was a significant difference between the right and left lower quadrants in patients with appendicitis. ⋯ There was no significant skin temperature differential between the lower abdominal quadrants in either patient group (0.0 degree C vs 0.1 degree C; P > .5). Three patients had a skin temperature on the right that was at least 1 degrees C warmer than on the left; none of these patients had appendicitis. The results suggest that infrared thermography is not a sensitive diagnostic test for acute appendicitis in the ED population.
-
To evaluate the recently published Utstein algorithm (Ann Emerg Med 1991;20:861), the authors conducted a retrospective review of all advanced life support (ALS) trip sheets and hospital records of patients with prehospital cardiac arrests between January 1988 and December 1989. Telephone follow-up was used to determine 1-year survival rates. Of 713 arrests in the 24-month study period, 601 were of presumed cardiac etiology. ⋯ The Utstein style was found to be a useful algorithmic format for reporting prehospital cardiac arrest data in a manner that should allow direct comparison between emergency medical service (EMS) systems. Existing prehospital record-keeping practices (trip sheets) are easily adapted to this style of data collection, although certain data for the template (eg, resuscitations not attempted and alive at 1-year) are more difficult to ascertain. Additionally, the authors report their own experience during a 2-year period, including data that suggest that the majority of patients with cardiac arrest who survive to hospital discharge are still alive at 1 year.
-
A case of atypical or complicated migraine is presented with signs and symptoms of meningeal irritation, projectile emesis NS obtundation, and unresponsiveness. The patient is a 19-year-old diabetic on insulin who had a mild episode of upper respiratory tract symptoms with severe headache and was found unresponsive and brought to the emergency department. After a work-up for meningitis was negative (as well as computerized tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) he recovered totally in 3 days with no residual signs or symptoms and was discharged from the hospital.
-
Case Reports
Severe low back pain secondary to acute interstitial nephritis following administration of ranitidine.
Acute interstitial nephritis is a disease characterized by renal inflammation and is thought to be secondary to a hypersensitivity reaction. Although the causes of acute interstitial nephritis are numerous, adverse reactions to many common drugs, particularly antibiotics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, are important etiological factors. ⋯ A case of acute, severe, low-back pain and rash in a healthy woman found to be secondary to acute interstitial nephritis is reported. The etiology of acute interstitial nephritis in this patient's case is suspected to be ranitidine (Zantac; Glaxo Pharmaceuticals, Research Triangle Park, NC), which has not been previously associated with this syndrome.
-
In 1989, Champion et al recommended revising the Trauma Score to exclude capillary refill because it is "difficult to assess at night. . . ." However, a literature search produced no studies evaluating the effect of lighting conditions on the assessment of capillary refill. This study was undertaken to determine if any such effect exists. ⋯ In daylight conditions (partly cloudy day, lux meter = 15 to 16), capillary refill was reported as normal in 94.2% of the participants, delayed in 1.9% of the participants, and undetected in 3.9% of the participants. In dark conditions (moonlight or street lamp, lux meter = 4 to 6), capillary refill was reported as normal in 31.7% of the participants, delayed in 1.6% of the participants, and undetected in 66.7% of the participants. chi 2 analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between capillary refill assessment in light versus dark environments (P < .001).